
Hey, everybody has a bad day from time to time, a day when work is the last thing you want to do and everyone knows it. For most of us, that means we’re a little more cranky with our co-workers than usual.
But what happens when it’s a comic strip writer who probably operates out of a home office in some remote location who’s feeling especially bitter or sad when they show up to work? Well, the stuff we’ve presented here today is probably what happens.
Here are seven very real nationally-run comic strips that no child should ever have been subjected to:
1. “B.C.” Gets Anti-Semitic
For decades, Johnny Hart has been sneaking in Pro-Christian themes into his Before Christian comic strip. Hey, who wouldn’t want their kids’ moral center to be a guy who draws women named “the fat broad” and “the cute chick?”
We’ll let you figure out who is whoIn his controversial 2001 Easter strip, Hart shows a picture of a menorah next to quotes from Jesus. With each quote, a candle goes out. When all the candles have been extinguished, the big-surprise-reveal-punch-line-thing is that the Menorah now looks like a cross. But, fortunately Hart snuck it into an Easter Sunday color strip, when most Jewish kids can’t read the paper because they are busy, like, totally not celebrating Easter or something. Also note how a caveman is writing about how awesome the Bible’s New Testament is. Who says you can’t merge evolution and religion! The caveman’s undiagnosed obsessive-compulsive disorder is hard to miss, and detracts from whatever the hell Johnny Hart thinks he is trying to say.
Also, we do realize this one is a kind of hard to read. That’s probably just because it’s so very wrong. Newspapers have a long standing tradition of trying to make their anti-Semitic rants as discreet as possible. At least we assume that’s what the issue is.
2. Liz Gets Sexually Assaulted in “For Better or For Worse”
(Source)
Now, to say that the subject of sexual assault in the workplace shouldn’t be tackled makes us look like dicks. Frankly, after that horrific B.C. cartoon, this feels like a cool, socially-responsible shower. But how does showing a man thrusting against a woman while pawing at her boob do anything but cause nightmares for children reading the comics section?
We’ve all fantasized about different cartoon moms (don’t lie, you’ve thought about a threesome with The Mom from Family Circus and The Mom from Sally Forth), but we’d never do something like this. Oh, and also, we’d never ever draw a picture of it and publish it nationally in the kids section of the newspaper. Note the surprise tease at the end. Is this a hero coming to Liz’s rescue? Or just one of the other creeps that haunt the world of “For Better or For Worse,” looking for some gimp play? Ah, the ferocious cliffhangers of comic strips. Either way, we would have nightmares for weeks if we were kids and we saw this next to one of the sweet and innocent comic strips. Like Garfield…
3. Garfield Loses His Innocence
(click image to see larger version)
Kids have come to rely upon the Garfield strip for mildly unfunny jokes set in a completely ambiguous interior room. Which is what’s most disturbing about this 6-day arc where everything Garfield loves disappears. No punchlines, unless “you have no idea how alone you are, Garfield” counts as a punchline. Finally, the story arc concludes with a close-up of Garfield’s seemingly amphetamine-amped eyeball. The eyeball has a bead of sweat rolling down it, Aeon Flux style, and looks like his optic nerve is about to pop.
This leaves so many questions. What drugs did Garfield take? Did John finally get sick of Garfield’s sarcastic comments and spike his food with 50 Gravol? What drug did cartoonist Jim Davis take? Or, more likely, what drug did he stop taking?
It hasn’t always been this bad, has it?
4. Andy Capp Beats His Wife, Just For Fun

This brutal 1957 panel of Andy Capp proves that yes, it has always been this bad.
In a smoky drawing room, the artist had to sit there and decide what a wife’s cheek bruise from a fist would look like in pen-pixelated black and white. That’s the part of Mad Men they don’t show you.
Children must’ve loved Andy Capp in the 1950s, especially those children with domestic abuse issues. They’d read the panel with their father (who would always laugh inappropriately hard) then go off to hide in a dusty garage cupboard.
Also notice that Andy Capp has flown into such a hilarious rage that he has apparently knocked the table over and sent a picture crooked. You can’t keep telling the emergency room that a tornado hit your house and knocked over your wife, Andy Capp.
To be fair, the comic strip has recently been given a modern makeover. Andy Capp and his wife are in marriage counselling and the abuse has been removed. But, to be even more fair, none of that is appropriate for children reading the funnies, either.
5. Marvin’s Grandfather Is a Friendless, Bankrupt Shell of a Man

Nothing says depressing like your baby bagging on your life. Or your friends leaving you. Or, frankly, the fact that you thought it was appropriate to bring a small child to a card game.
Marvin’s grandpa gambles for matchsticks, which hearkens back to the days when matchsticks were actually worth money, because fire hadn’t been discovered yet. Also, has anyone noticed that Marvin appears not to be a baby, but a fully functional grown person who simply has some sort of Benjamin Button disease? I wouldn’t count on Grandpa noticing, he’s too busy with his suicidal ramblings. Ah, Marvin, you’re going to have a drinking problem by the time you turn five.
6. Calvin’s Hallucination-Causing Depression Continues to Go Untreated
(click image to view larger version)
While Calvin & Hobbes might be the most consistently awesome comic strip of all time, Bill Watterson always loves to cast judgment on mankind for being human.
Rather than doing what every other 6-year-old boy would do (chuck the bird carcass at a speeding car), Calvin has an emotional breakdown about the frailty of life. Right now, a lot of you are probably saying, “Calvin’s confrontational nature with the utter fabric of reality is exactly what makes this comic strip excellent.” If this is you, ask yourself, “am I nine years old, and therefore the target audience for the Sunday comics section?”
The strip concludes with them staring at birds, melancholic expressions on their face. Notice the big block of white space where an uplifting punch line should go. No punch line today, little children! I wonder if trick-or-treating children knock on Watterson’s door, and instead of getting a candy treat, they get exposed to the mind-numbing horror of death and the unknown.
7. Momma Gets Propositioned for Sex after a Funeral

(Source)
So, this features: old people talking about casual sex, the word “stuffing” in related to Momma’s hoo-ha and (to complete the obvious trio) bereavement. This has changed from a witty cartoon about a grandma and her hipster grandson to mature necro porn.
Also, what kind of creep goes around trying to bang bereaved grannies? I guess when you’re that old, you have to take every statement from a female as an invitation to initiate sex. But, “I am unable to cope without my dead husband,” isn’t really a come on… or maybe it is, we don’t really speak horny old people jive.
Also, dude needs to take a hint, the woman regards him with such an abject level of formality that she calls you “Mr.” followed by the first letter of his last name (which she probably doesn’t even know.) There will be no metaphorical dust being knocked off of anything, today.
Luckily, most children probably didn’t even get this reference. That is, until these fans of Momma (drunken child hicks) ask their parents, and are probably told that “stuffing it” means something like sending Momma to the taxidermist before mounting her in the den.
Parents trick themselves into thinking the bad guys are easy for their kids to spot. In reality, anyone who communicates with children could be a potential threat and, sadly, this now includes the funnies. Letting children use any medium unmonitored is like getting drunk with Charlie Sheen without a condom/diaphragm permanently taped to one’s junk.
Evan Hoovler also writes for Blastr and Gamespy. He co-wrote the National Lampoon book, “Pimp It Yourself”, and wants to be your Facebook friend.
A DailyKix Top Story – Trackback from DailyKix.com…
7 Traumatizing Editions of Beloved Comic Strips…
7 Traumatizing Editions of Beloved Comic Strips…
This article has been featured on Gunaxin Links…
1:04 pm on February 17th, 2011
A DailyKix Top Story – Trackback from DailyKix.com…
7 Traumatizing Editions of Beloved Comic Strips…
1:45 pm on February 17th, 2011
As much as the comics are a medium for children, I don’t think Calvin and Hobbes was ever written as a piece directed at children. It was a verbose and intelligent piece of art that had appeal to every age group.
I don’t even think it’s that traumatizing. A kid just wouldn’t get that comic and move on.
2:04 pm on February 17th, 2011
i always liked that calvin and hobbes strip, it made me think, and i read it when i was about 10.
so yea i wouldnt call #6 traumatizing, but it was still a good article throughout.
3:37 pm on February 17th, 2011
Retarded article. The author should kill himself and bless the world with the action.
3:53 pm on February 17th, 2011
Methinks Evan does not understand what “Anti-Semitic” means.
4:07 pm on February 17th, 2011
Assuming that all comics and cartoons are meant for children is so 1950s! It is 2011. I am so sick of hearing “Won’t somebody think of the children?”.
5:05 pm on February 17th, 2011
You’re wrong about the BC comic. That isn’t a menorah, it has the wrong number of candles.
8:16 pm on February 17th, 2011
7 Traumatizing Editions of Beloved Comic Strips…
This article has been featured on Gunaxin Links…
9:58 pm on February 17th, 2011
I grew up with all of these and even remember some of your examples. I have to say that whatever else Johnny Hart wrote, I never once saw anything that I would remotely consider anti-semtic. Sexist (went with the times) obviously, conservative both fiscally and socially, Christian (some of the best people I know are Christians, and Jewish, and Jehovah’s witness, and Buddhist, and even Moslem), but I never saw anything remotely anti-semitic.
I enjoyed these as a child, not so much as an adult; they reflected American society of the times, and when times changed they changed, or died with their artists.
11:04 pm on February 17th, 2011
This author is an idiot. Really. That article is pro-christian. In a non-pushy way. I shouldn’t be offensive to those of the Jewish faith. Jesus was jewish after all.
3:39 pm on February 19th, 2011
If you believe the comics section of a newspaper is INTENDED for 9 year olds you’ve lost touch with reality. Since comics pages began the funnies have always been aimed at adults as comedy relief for the depressing news of the day. That kids often like them too is a side effect, not the goal. The funnies have always been aimed at adults.
2:45 pm on February 23rd, 2011
“no child should ever have been subjected to”
“publish it nationally in the kids section of the newspaper”
“appropriate for children reading the funnies”
“am I nine years old, and therefore the target audience for the Sunday comics section?”
I’ve managed to pinpoint your problem, Evan. You are still laboring under the false assumptions that 1) The comics in the Sunday paper are for children (they aren’t, never were) and 2) children still read (the few that do don’t waste their time with a dead medium).
But nice little piece of fluff masquerading as “won’t someone please think of the children” alarmism. Shame about the flawed premise.
9:44 pm on March 20th, 2011
Exactly what is wrong with the BC strip? I think it’s beautiful. Are you anti-Catholic?
6:52 pm on November 13th, 2011
kids in general haven’t read the sunday funnies in years. They are not the audience. Those that do read will not be traumatized as most of these would go over their heads. They are also less fragile than you suppose. I’ll give you that andy cap but there’a a reason you had to reach back 54 years for it. Nobody would print that now.
BC? you’re ill informed. While it’s not a menorah, it is a clear “Old Testament supplanted by New Testament” image. That’s a central tenant of christianity, and nothing ant-semitic about it. Christians believe Jesus was the fulfillment of much of the OT, supplanting the old sacrificial system, and rules (i.e Old covenant). This does not wipe it out in any way, which is why we have both in the Bible. The NT (new covenant) is seen as God’s further teaching to the Jews, and expanding the scope of Judaism to encompass the gentiles, with an evangelistic emphasis not present before. Many Christians (so-called) have done horrible things to Jews and others, but that does not make the christian message anti-semetic.